Search Results

Registration form for the training course: Offshore Wind Upskilling Course First Name Last Name Email Address Phone Number Company / Organization Name Job Title or Position Address Confirm the course name Offshore Wind Upskilling Course Are you applying as: * Individual Group Select the course date * Spring Session Fall Session By clicking submit you agree to our Terms and Conditions Submit Your application has been submitted. We will reach out to you to complete the payment

Offshore Wind Upskilling Course Offshore wind energy, upskilling, technical training, workforce development, renewable energy jobs, wind turbine technician, offshore wind technician, blade repair, turbine maintenance, electrical safety, hydraulic systems, mechanical systems, gearbox maintenance, generator repair, control systems, SCADA, wind farm operations, offshore operations, maritime safety, sea survival, working at heights, confined space entry, first aid, CPR, rescue training, heavy lifting, crane operations, rigging, signaling, welding, fabrication, composite materials, fiber optics, cable splicing, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, marine engineering, metocean data, site assessment, wind resource assessment, environmental impact assessment, permitting, project management, construction management, commissioning, operations and maintenance, logistics, supply chain, port infrastructure, vessel operations, crew transfer vessels, helicopter operations, safety management systems, risk assessment, hazard identification, incident reporting, personal protective equipment (PPE), fall protection, lockout/tagout, energy storage, grid integration, smart grid, digitalization, automation, data analytics, predictive maintenance, remote sensing, remote operations, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), drones, subsea cables, scour protection, foundation installation, turbine installation, offshore platforms, floating offshore wind, deepwater wind, wind farm layout, array cabling, export cable, onshore substation, offshore substation, high voltage direct current (HVDC), power transmission, grid connection, renewable energy certificates (RECs), carbon reduction, climate change mitigation, green jobs, sustainable development, blue economy, coastal communities, economic development, vocational training, apprenticeships, internships, online learning, blended learning, simulation training, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), competency-based training, certification programs, global wind organization (GWO), basic safety training (BST), basic technical training (BTT), advanced rescue training, sea survival, working at height, confined space, first aid, manual handling, fire awareness, offshore wind safety, health and safety, regulatory compliance, OSHA, IMO, MCA, wind turbine inspection, nondestructive testing (NDT), blade inspection, tower inspection, foundation inspection, underwater inspection, remote visual inspection (RVI), acoustic monitoring, vibration monitoring, oil and gas industry, maritime industry, construction industry, manufacturing industry, engineering industry, skilled trades, electricians, mechanics, welders, technicians, engineers, project managers, supervisors, safety officers, training instructors, training providers, educational institutions, universities, colleges, vocational schools, community colleges, professional development, continuing education, lifelong learning, reskilling, career pathways, green skills, future of work, energy transition, sustainability, innovation, technology, digital transformation, offshore wind innovation, research and development, wind energy research, marine research, environmental research, social impact, community engagement, stakeholder engagement, public awareness, offshore wind awareness, clean energy, renewable energy, sustainable energy, energy security, energy independence, climate action, Paris Agreement, net zero emissions, carbon neutrality, green economy, circular economy, just transition, workforce diversity, inclusion, equity, gender equality, youth employment, skills gap, talent acquisition, talent retention, human resources, recruitment, onboarding, training needs analysis, learning management systems (LMS), e-learning, mobile learning, microlearning, gamification, assessment methods, evaluation, training effectiveness, return on investment (ROI), cost-effectiveness, quality assurance, accreditation, standards, best practices, industry standards, international standards, national standards, regional standards, local standards, offshore wind cluster, supply chain development, local content, economic benefits, job creation, investment opportunities, infrastructure development, port development, maritime infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, energy infrastructure, renewable energy infrastructure, offshore wind farm development, wind farm development, renewable energy development, sustainable development goals (SDGs), global goals, climate goals, energy goals, economic goals, social goals, environmental goals, offshore wind industry, wind industry, renewable energy industry, energy industry, maritime industry, construction industry, manufacturing industry, engineering industry, education industry, training industry, government agencies, regulatory bodies, industry associations, professional organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), research institutions, academic institutions, private sector, public sector, partnerships, collaborations, knowledge sharing, technology transfer, innovation ecosystem, offshore wind ecosystem, renewable energy ecosystem, sustainable development ecosystem, future skills, emerging technologies, disruptive technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), big data, internet of things (IoT), blockchain, robotics, automation, additive manufacturing, 3D printing, digital twins, virtual commissioning, remote diagnostics, condition monitoring, predictive analytics, data-driven decision making, smart maintenance, autonomous systems, unmanned systems, remote control, digital tools, software, platforms, cloud computing, cybersecurity, data security, privacy, ethical considerations, social responsibility, corporate social responsibility (CSR), environmental sustainability, economic sustainability, social sustainability, triple bottom line, stakeholder engagement, community benefits, local communities, indigenous communities, marine environment, biodiversity, ecosystem services, marine protected areas, environmental protection, conservation, mitigation measures, environmental monitoring, social impact assessment, cultural heritage, maritime archaeology, visual impact, noise pollution, light pollution, electromagnetic fields (EMF), shadow flicker, public health, safety culture, risk management culture, continuous improvement, lessons learned, best practices sharing, industry collaboration, global collaboration, international cooperation, knowledge exchange, technology transfer, capacity building, sustainable development goals (SDGs), offshore wind roadmap, energy transition roadmap, climate action roadmap, green skills roadmap, workforce development strategy, skills development strategy, education and training strategy, innovation strategy, research and development strategy, policy framework, regulatory framework, permitting process, environmental impact assessment process, social impact assessment process, stakeholder engagement process, public consultation, community consultation, environmental compliance, safety compliance, regulatory compliance, legal framework, international law, national law, regional law, local law, offshore wind lease, seabed lease, grid connection agreement, power purchase agreement (PPA), financial incentives, tax credits, subsidies, investment support, project finance, risk management, insurance, due diligence, feasibility study, business case, market analysis, competitive landscape, supply chain analysis, value chain analysis, cost analysis, revenue projections, financial modeling, economic impact assessment, social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, sustainability assessment, life cycle assessment, circular economy principles, waste management, recycling, reuse, end-of-life management, decommissioning, repowering, offshore wind repowering, life extension, asset management, operations and maintenance strategy, maintenance planning, maintenance scheduling, preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, condition-based maintenance, predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, digital twins, virtual commissioning, remote operations, autonomous systems, unmanned systems, data analytics, machine learning, artificial intelligence, smart maintenance, energy efficiency, cost optimization, performance optimization, reliability, availability, maintainability, safety, security, environmental protection, social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, community benefits, local content, economic development, job creation, investment opportunities, infrastructure development, port development, maritime infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, energy infrastructure, renewable energy infrastructure, offshore wind farm development, wind farm development, renewable energy development, sustainable development goals (SDGs), offshore wind roadmap, energy transition roadmap, climate action roadmap, green skills roadmap, workforce development strategy, skills development strategy, education and training strategy, innovation strategy, research and development strategy, policy framework, regulatory framework, permitting process, environmental impact assessment process, social impact assessment process, stakeholder engagement process, public consultation, community consultation, environmental compliance, safety compliance, regulatory compliance, legal framework, international law, national law, regional law, local law, offshore wind lease, seabed lease, grid connection agreement, power purchase agreement (PPA), financial incentives, tax credits, subsidies, investment support, project finance, risk management, insurance, due diligence, feasibility study, business case, market analysis, competitive landscape, supply chain analysis, value chain analysis, cost analysis, revenue projections, financial modeling, economic impact assessment, social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, sustainability assessment, life cycle assessment, circular economy principles, waste management, recycling, reuse, end-of-life management, decommissioning, repowering, offshore wind repowering, life extension, asset management, operations and maintenance strategy, maintenance planning, maintenance scheduling, preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, condition-based maintenance, predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, digital twins, virtual commissioning, remote operations, autonomous systems, unmanned systems, data analytics, machine learning, artificial intelligence, smart maintenance, energy efficiency, cost optimization, performance optimization, reliability, availability, maintainability, safety, security, environmental protection, social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, community benefits, local content, economic development, job creation, investment opportunities, infrastructure development, port development, maritime infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, energy infrastructure, renewable energy infrastructure, offshore wind farm development, wind farm development, renewable energy development, sustainable development goals (SDGs), offshore wind roadmap, energy transition roadmap, climate action roadmap, green skills roadmap, workforce development strategy, skills development strategy, education and training strategy, innovation strategy, research and development strategy, policy framework, regulatory framework, permitting process, environmental impact assessment process, social impact assessment process, stakeholder engagement process, public consultation, community consultation, environmental compliance, safety compliance, regulatory compliance, legal framework, international law, national law, regional law, local law, offshore wind lease, seabed lease, grid connection agreement, power purchase agreement (PPA), financial incentives, tax credits, subsidies, investment support, project finance, risk management, insurance, due diligence, feasibility study, business case, market analysis, competitive landscape, supply chain analysis, value chain analysis, cost analysis, revenue projections, financial modeling, economic impact assessment, social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, sustainability assessment, life cycle assessment, circular economy principles, waste management, recycling, reuse, decommissioning, repowering, life extension, asset, operations, maintenance, planning, scheduling, preventive, corrective, condition, predictive, diagnostics, virtual, remote, autonomous, unmanned, data, learning, artificial, smart, energy, cost, performance, reliability, availability, maintainability, safety, security, environmental, social, stakeholder, community, local, Offshore Wind Upskilling Course Price Please inquire Duration 3-Day Dates June 17-19, 2025 Format Virtual (Live) Course Status Open Enroll < Back Offshore Wind Upskilling Course The Offshore Wind Upskilling Course is a comprehensive three-day program providing a detailed exploration of the offshore wind project life cycle. This course is designed to offer a thorough understanding of the intricacies within the rapidly evolving offshore wind industry. The course is instructed by a team of esteemed experts with extensive experience in various aspects of offshore wind projects. It is tailored to equip participants with the knowledge necessary to navigate the challenges and opportunities within this industry. This course will take place from 9am until 5pm EST each day online. An internet connection and a device compatible with Microsoft Teams is required to attend this course. Course Objective: The course objective for the Offshore Wind Upskilling course is to equip participants with a comprehensive understanding of the offshore wind industry, covering project development, design and construction, operations, and decommissioning. Attendees will gain insights into the intricacies of offshore wind projects and the essential skills required to contribute to this dynamic field. Main Learning Objectives: Participants can map out the process of a wind farm's lifecycle from market conception through decomissioning Participants can describe at a high-level the main goal & activities that are executed in each step of the wind farm lifecycle process Who Should Attend? Industry Professionals: This course is ideal for professionals within the energy and offshore wind sector who aim to expand their knowledge in this field. Companies in Offshore Wind: Individuals and organizations actively engaged or considering entry into offshore wind development will find this course beneficial. Suppliers and manufacturers looking to broaden their understanding of the offshore wind industry Government Personnel: Government employees looking to enhance their understanding of offshore wind projects, regulations, and the broader industry will benefit from this program. Cross-Industry Professionals: Individuals from diverse professional backgrounds seeking to leverage technical insights from the American Offshore Wind Academy are also welcome to participate. What Attendees Think: “This course was an invaluable learning experience for any engineer interested in the offshore wind industry. It provided a comprehensive overview of the turbine lifecycle, from leasing to decommissioning. I also learned about the essential roles of ports, vessels, and logistics in transporting turbine components to the site. One of the highlights was the floating wind turbine site exercise, which taught me the strategic site selection process before leasing applications.” - Marwa A. PhD candidate, Western University Course Outline Day 1: Project Development - Introduction to the Course - Welcome and Course Overview - Course Objectives - Onshore to Offshore Wind - Offshore Wind Market Trends - Key Players and Developments - Market Challenges and Opportunities - Regulatory Framework Overview - Ongoing Regulatory Compliance - Evolving Offshore Wind Policies - Environmental and Safety Standard - Overview of Development Process - Stages of Offshore Wind Project Development - Permitting and Environmental Considerations - Stakeholder Engagement - Elements of an Offshore Wind Farm - Offshore wind farm components and infrastructure - WTG components & technology overview - Key Design Considerations for WTGs - Financing - Investment Considerations - Project Financing and Investment Structures - Financial Risk Management - Leasing & Permitting - Regulatory and Licensing Requirements - Leasing Process - Initial Design Concepts - Financial Feasibility - Permitting Challenges and Solutions - Ports and Vessels I - Port Infrastructure - Vessel Types and Operations - Logistics and Efficiency Day 2: Design and Construction - Feasibility Analysis and Site characterization - Data Collection and Analysis - Metocean Assessment - Wind Energy Assessment - Geotechnical Surveys - Geophysical Surveys - Environmental Impact Assessments - Data Integration and Decision Making - Detailed Project Design - Foundation - Foundation Design Selection and their Drivers - Geotechnical and Structural Design Aspects - Trends and Innovations - OSW Project Design - Advanced Design Aspects and Considerations - Detailed Engineering - Technology Selection - Offshore Wind Turbine Technologies - Electrical Infrastructure - Procurement Strategies - Procurement Process - RFP Structure, quantitative and qualitative metrics - Community Benefit Agreements - Ports & Vessel II - O&M Vessels and Bases - Access Solutions - O&M Facilities - O&M Strategy - Floating Offshore Wind - Floating Concept in OSW - Type of FOSW Technologies - Selection Process and Supply Chain - FOSW Future Trends Day 3: Operations and Decommissioning - Construction Managemen t - Installation Planning - Supply Chain Management - Construction Coordination - On-Site Construction - Safety Protocols - Quality Control - Operations and Maintenance - Maintenance and Repairs - Performance Optimization - Health, Safety, and Environmental Considerations - Remote Monitoring and Control - Data Analytics - Cost Reduction Strategies - Transmission - Electrical Systems Overview - Substations and Grid Connection - Power Transmission Challenges - Submarine Cable Systems - Installation Challenges - Maintenance and Repairs - Cabling - Safety, Compliance, and Statutory Training - Safety Protocols and Training - Compliance Monitoring - Statutory Requirements - Decommissioning - Decommissioning Process Overview - Environmental Remediation - Legal and Financial Aspects - US - Looking Ahead - Future of Offshore Wind in the US - Emerging Trends and Opportunities - Preparing for Industry Evolution - Course Conclusion and Certificates Course Completion Certificate: Upon completing at least 50% of the course and achieving a minimum passing score of 50% on a post-course assessment, participants will receive a course certificate valid for three years. This certificate verifies that the essential learning outcomes of the course have been met. While not mandatory, this certification is currently undergoing an accreditation process to further enhance its value, allowing it to be used for job applications, promotions, and professional license renewals, such as the PE (Professional Engineer) license. Teaching Team Jim Bennett Former Chief of The Office of Renewable Energy Programs, BOEM Jim Bennett, recognized both domestically and internationally as an expert on environmental review and development of natural resources on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), recently retired after 43 years of Federal service including more than seven years as the Renewable Energy Program Manager in Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). Under his leadership, the Program managed the upsurge in Atlantic renewable energy leases, the installation of the first OCS steel-in-the-water, and the approval of the first two commercial-scale wind farms in U.S. waters. Jim also led the Bureau’s Division of Environmental Assessment for many years. He now shares his vast experience and unique expertise with our new national offshore wind industry. He provides industry training and is currently associated with the highly ranked, full-service global business and technology consultancy Burns & MacDonnell. Serene Hamsho President, American Offshore Wind Academy Serene Hamsho serves as the President of the American Offshore Wind Academy, an innovative initiative backed by the industry leaders in the offshore wind sector. The Academy is dedicated to the promotion and enhancement of the offshore wind industry, both within the United States and on a global scale, through extensive education, training programs, and fostering collaborative efforts. Serene has more than 14 years of diverse experience within the wind energy sector. Her career includes the role of Director of Technology and Innovation at Hexicon North America, where she focused on pioneering advancements in floating offshore wind technology. Prior to this position, Serene held the position of Senior Engineering Manager at Avangrid Renewables, where she was responsible for overseeing engineering activities pertaining to multi-billion-dollar offshore wind farm projects across North America. Her journey also encompasses a period as a Visiting Scientist at the MIT Energy Initiative, during which she played an influential role in the development of cutting-edge offshore wind technologies. Jay Borkland Director of Ports and Supply Chain, Avangrid Mr. Borkland currently holds a Director position in Ports and Supply Chain Development at Avangrid Renewables in the U.S. He is a Visiting Scholar at Tufts University in Massachusetts, teaching and conducting research in Offshore Wind and Sustainability. Mr. Borkland is also currently acting as Chairman of the Board of Directors for the U.S. Offshore Wind trade organization: The Business Network for Offshore Wind; and is an active participant in the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), where he is an editor and contributing author for UNGC document development for its Sustainability and Ocean Renewable Energy programs. Over the past 38 years, Mr. Borkland has been involved in large infrastructure and energy projects, with over two decades of that in the Offshore Wind sector of the Ocean Renewable Energy arena. He was the team lead for the development and construction of the first-in-the-nation Offshore Wind marshalling port facility in the U.S. in Massachusetts, and has acted as lead and/or contributing author for the Offshore Wind Infrastructure Master Plans for the states of MA, VA, NY, CT, NJ, NC and MD. Today he stays active assisting Avangrid Renewables develop multiple Wind Farms in the U.S. Adrienne Downey Principal Engineer and Country Manager, Hexicon Adrienne Downey is the Principal Engineer and Country Manager for Hexicon North America. Adrienne most recently was the Principal Engineer for offshore wind for the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA). During her tenure, Adrienne led NYSERDA’s nation-leading offshore wind program with the goal of reaching 9 gigawatts by 2035, and successfully procured an excess of 4.1 GW and associated port infrastructure: a total portfolio valued at over $22B USD. Adrienne holds a degree in Chemical Engineer from McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and a Masters in Sustainable Environmental Systems from the Pratt Institute in New York City. She holds numerous Board seats in support of the offshore wind industry including the National Offshore Wind R&D Consortium (NOWRDC), Offshore Wind California (OWC), Board Member of Marine Renewables Canada, and Advisory Board Member of the American Offshore Wind Academy (AOWA). Theodore Paradise Energy Partner, K&L Gates Theodore Paradise is a Partner in the Energy, infrastructure, and Resources practice at the global law firm of K&L Gates in the Boston, New York City, and Washington, DC offices. He has over 23 years of experience in the energy industry both in private practice and as the Chief Legal and Policy Officer for a European floating offshore wind developer, and as the Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer and Counsel for a US-based developer of subsea transmission for offshore wind. Theodore was also in charge of transmission planning and system operations regulatory issues for a US grid operator. Theodore has a deep understanding of US regulatory law, and has represented clients before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in state public utility commission proceedings, and before the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the Department of Energy. He has worked with clients on project RFP strategy and submissions on the east and west coasts of the US. Theodore has also been a leading policy voice on transmission for offshore wind and other renewables, educating law makers, legislators, and leading industry discussions on ways to address this industry challenge and steps that can help both scale and derisk project development, as well as participating in technical study groups. He holds his Juris Doctor degree from Georgetown University in Washington, DC. Richard Baldwin Senior Scientist, McAllister Marine Engineering Mr. Baldwin currently holds a position of Senior Scientist at McAllister Marine Engineering and his practice focusses primarily on supporting the offshore wind (OSW) industry currently developing off of the coasts of the U.S., as well as addressing coastal area impacts associated with global climate change. He is a licensed Professional Geologist in New York and in Pennsylvania, and an American Institute of Professional Geologists Certified Professional Geologist. He is an Adjunct Professor in the Earth Sciences Department at State University of New York at Stony Brook. Over the last 36 year, Mr. Baldwin has been providing subject matter expert (SME) expertise and consulting services associated with projects involving ports and harbors/waterway infrastructure studies, OSW development (including its local, national and international supply chains), OSW vessel logistics strategies, storm recovery and remedial actions, resiliency, flood-event evaluations, environmental investigations at industrial, private, federal and publicly-owned facilities. He has been involved in multiple state-led OSW ports studies and OSW strategic plans for a multitude of states including Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Virgina. He has designed and implemented environmental investigations, remediation work plans, evasive species identification and eradication programs, bathymetric surveys, geotechnical evaluations, regulatory permit evaluation/acquisition, contractor evaluation/oversight, and public awareness and education. In his volunteer life, Mr. Baldwin as a volunteer Emergency Medical Technician for the East Moriches Community Ambulance and is a Board Member of the Peconic Land Trust. Sarah McElman Lead Consultant, Metocean Expert Americas Sarah McElman is a metocean analyst with a background in spectral wave modeling, computational fluid dynamics, and scale model testing. She is the former metocean lead for Avangrid Renewables and has over 10 years of experience in offshore site assessment for fixed and floating projects in the United States, Europe, and Asia. While at Avangrid, Sarah managed metocean buoy, FLiDAR, and other measurement campaigns across the US and Europe, in addition to leading the metocean dimensions of new business, development, and operational preparedness. Prior to joining Avangrid, Sarah was a computational modeler at Deltares and MARIN. Luke Liu Director of Flagship Investment, CIP Luke is a Director on CIP’s Flagship Investment Team and has 10+ years of energy infrastructure investment experience. At CIP, Luke focuses on the origination and execution of CIP’s transactions in North America including offshore wind, onshore renewables, storage and transmission. Prior to joining CIP, Luke was a Director at Kindle Energy and a Vice President in Macquarie’s Green Investment Group. Luke started his career at Macquarie Capital in the principal investing group, focused on structured equity and debt investments. Throughout his career, Luke has transacted on over 10+ GW of renewable energy assets and raised over $3+ billion of project capital. Luke received his BA from Columbia University and his MBA from Northwestern Kellogg School of Management. Dr. Mike Tabrizi, PhD PE President and Founder of Zero-Emission Grid, LLC Dr. Mike Tabrizi, PhD PE, is the President and Founder of Zero-Emission Grid, LLC, a prominent professional advisory firm specializing in onshore and offshore transmission, interconnection, and electricity markets. With over 15 years of experience in power grid planning and operation, Dr. Tabrizi is a nationally recognized expert in Transmission and Interconnection. Dr. Tabrizi has played key roles as Principal Engineer and Subject Matter Expert in numerous high-profile projects, such as the PJM Offshore Transmission State Agreement Approach, New York NYSERDA long-term offshore transmission planning, ERCOT CREZ, Integration of LP&L to ERCOT, ERCOT North to Houston Transmission Project, Integration of Rayburn Electric from SPP to ERCOT, and Texas Lower Grand Valley Transmission Projects. Before establishing Zero-Emission Grid, Dr. Tabrizi was the VP of Power Grid Strategy at Lancium. Prior to his time at Lancium, he led DNV Energy Systems' North America Power System Advisory Division. Myra Wong Manager, Offshore Wind Turbine Generator, Invenergy Myra has been in the wind industry for over 12 years with a focus on wind turbine technology, with 11.5 years spent in the onshore wind division at GE Vernova. She has held roles with increasing leadership responsibility throughout the lifecycle of a wind turbine; from early design and product development to applications engineering and siting to operations engineering support. Prior to joining Invenergy, Myra led the Services Systems Engineering team at GE, a global team of engineers designing repowering and performance upgrade solutions for operating onshore wind turbines. She has also previously led the Fleet Performance Engineering for GE’s operating fleet in North America, resolving technical issues around availability and power performance as well as developing analytics to allow for proactive diagnostics with turbine operational data. Since May 2023, Myra has been at Chicago-based Invenergy, leading the technical risk assessment and due diligence of offshore wind turbine generators for Invenergy’s global offshore wind portfolio. Myra graduated magna cum laude with a B.S. in Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering and an M.Eng in Systems Engineering from Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. She resides in Albany, New York. Ben Brown Client Advisor, Marsh Mr. Brown brings more than 12 years of technology and project development experience to INpower from the offshore wind, marine hydro kinetic, aquaculture, and renewable biofuel industries. Prior to joining INpower, Mr. Brown worked on behalf of the Business Network for Offshore Wind where consulted with companies on technology commercialization, supply chain entry, and project development needs; while also consulting with federal agencies and state governments on the impacts of policy and regulation. Before entering the insurance field, Mr. Brown operated as project development professional who helped start-ups, non-profits, and growing companies in the development of over $100 million in projects. Sarah Collmus Director of Training and Education, American Offshore Wind Academy / Former Offshore Wind Engineer and Technician, GE Vernova Sarah spent 7 years with GE Vernova in various roles through all the sectors in wind through the GE leadership program Renewable Energy Development Program and in post-program roles with GE Offshore Wind and LM Wind Power. Her roles in Fleet Performance Engineering, Drive Systems Design, and a technician at Block Island Wind Farm have given her deep Operations & Maintenance understanding. Even though her training is as a Mechanical Engineer, these days she enjoys educating others on offshore wind and getting them just as excited and passionate about the industry as she is! Michael Shaw Senior Structural Engineer, 2H Offshore Michael is a Senior Structural Engineer with 2H Offshore working on fixed and floating wind foundation structures. He has worked on the design of monopile and jacket foundations for fixed wind and all primary anchoring types for floating wind. Key areas of technical expertise include global coupled and local structural analysis of both primary and secondary steel structures. Michael holds a Master’s degree in Mechanical and Offshore Engineering, Robert Gordon University, he is also a chartered engineer with IMechE. Creed Goff, R.G. Technical Director - Geotechnical Division, Alpine Mr. Goff, Technical Director of the Geotechnical Division at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc., is a Registered Geologist (R.G.) with 5 years of academic and 10 years of professional experience. His role involves managing and training field geotechnical personnel, providing technical support for commercial and field operations, and project management. Engaged in mobilizations, acquisition, processing, and QA/QC, Mr. Goff's expertise spans geological, geotechnical, engineering support, and environmental studies in maritime and terrestrial environments. Beginning at the University of Arizona, he obtained a BSc. in Geology, followed by work in geotechnics in Panama, where he contributed significantly to geological surveys for hazard assessment, construction, and research projects, including work on the design of the new Panama Canal locks. Returning to the US, he joined a geotechnical engineering firm, performing data acquisition, laboratory analysis, and aiding in engineering design and construction recommendations across the central US. After completing an MSc. in Structural Geology with Geophysics from the University of Leeds in 2019, Mr. Goff joined Alpine in 2021. His diverse involvement includes geotechnical and geophysical surveys, focusing on sediment sampling site investigations along the eastern US for cable route studies and cable landfalls, contributing to Alpine's inaugural in-house CPT system deployment. ployment. The course outline is subject to change and a detailed agenda will be shared after enrollment.

Explore AOWA’s comprehensive offshore wind training programs. Find courses designed for professionals at every stage of their careers Upcoming Sessions Offshore Wind Blade Testing and Inspection Workshop Safety July 24, 2025 View Course Offshore Wind Operation and Maintenance Operation September 22-23, 2025 View Course Offshore Wind Transmission Course Technology October 14-16, 2025 View Course Floating Offshore Wind Masterclass Development October 23, 2025 View Course Financing Offshore Wind From Auction To FID Financing Coming Fall 2025 - Enroll to stay updated View Course Offshore Wind Upskilling Course Development Coming Fall 2025 - Enroll to stay updated View Course Offshore Wind MetOcean Training Course Development Spring Session: May 12, 2025 Fall Session: On demand - Enroll now View Course OSW Risk Management, Insurance & Marine Warranty Surveying Development Spring Session: May 15, 2025 Fall Session: On demand - Enroll now View Course Auctions and Bid Strategies for Offshore Wind Development On demand - Enroll now View Course Performance Based Safety Management Systems in OSW Safety On demand - Enroll now View Course Offshore Wind Ports and Vessels Course Construction On demand - Enroll now View Course Offshore Wind Geophysical and Geotechnical Training Development On demand - Enroll now View Course Load more

Explore expert insights and industry perspectives on offshore wind energy from AOWA's network of thought leaders, innovators, and policy voices. Op-Eds After Empire June 19th. 2025 Written by Dawn MacDonald, Global Offshore Wind Sector Lead at AECOM Read More Let Developers Lead: The Smarter Path Forward For Offshore Wind May 30th, 2025 Written by Siniša Lozo, Director of Business Development at Naver Energy Read More Offshore Wind: The Reliability Anchor Hiding in Plain Sight May 16th, 2025 Written by Adrienne Downey, Director of Offshore Wind at Power Advisory LLC. Read More

< Back After Empire June 19th. 2025 Written by Dawn MacDonald, Global Offshore Wind Sector Lead at AECOM Now that Empire Wind has gotten a reprieve from its unforeseen stop work order, the US offshore wind industry is releasing a collective sigh of relief and looking to rapidly get turbines in the water before the industry is again in the crosshairs. Not to rain on anyone’s parade, but while the industry pushes to get this next round of projects online, a bit of contemplation of ‘what’s next’ is worthwhile for those of us not on the front lines. The administration’s U-turn on the Empire Wind’s stop work order gives the US domestic offshore wind market some confidence that business pragmatism may ultimately outweigh the new administration’s opposition to the sector. The US market’s downturn could ultimately benefit the global OSW market, releasing pressure on stretched global OEMs and investors, however, the implications for long term confidence in the US market is unclear at this point. Impressive Progress to Date There are currently five commercial scale offshore wind projects (including Empire Wind ), in construction in the US, including Dominion Energy ’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) Commercial project, Ørsted ’s Revolution and Sunrise wind projects and the Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners / Avangrid Vineyard wind project. Barring any further interruptions to these late state projects, we should expect to see around 6 GW of offshore wind deployed on US coasts and injecting power into US grids by the end of 2027. Significant investments have been made in developing the supporting infrastructure to build this initial tranche of generation assets, including: A Jones Act compliant wind turbine installation vessel ( WTIV ), the Charybdis , as well as other smaller bespoke vessels. Multiple ports to support project construction and operations. (New Bedford Commerce Terminal in MA, Port of New London in CT, Port of Davisville in RI, The South Brooklyn Marine Terminal in NY, and The New Jersey Wind Port). Manufacturing facilities to build some of the key components of the projects like high voltage subsea cables in Charleston, South Carolina and Chesapeake, Virginia by Nexans and LS GreenLink respectively. While this is meaningful progress, it’s quite different from the level of development envisioned by the prior administration in implementing the Inflation Reduction Act and the level of investment predicted by the industry. With the recent changes in tax and regulatory policy, it’s fair to say the industry is generally not expecting substantial progress in regulatory approval or construction for the next three and a half years beyond the 6 GW mentioned above. So, what might a renewed view of US offshore wind look like to potential developers and states in 2028? Cautious Optimism Developers and investors who’ve collectively sunk billions into the market are likely counting on a couple points to support the ultimate return of the US OSW market. - A backlog of generation , particularly in the US Northeast: The region is currently largely powered by natural gas, nuclear power, and hydropower. Several of these existing power generation faculties are targeted for retirement over the next decade. Combined with the increased power demand driven by increased electrification and new demands like data centers, there is a significant need for new generation in the region, which the ISOs in the region had been looking to offshore wind to fill. Should the next phase of consented projects, including the next phase of Empire Wind and Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind , not progress through to financial close as planned, ISOs in the region will have a gap in the generation side of their long-range plans. What alternative technology can fill that gap? Per recent comments from the CEO of NextEra Energy Resources a, the US’s largest power developer, a new natural gas power plant would be looking at a deployment in 2030 or later , and a cost of $2,400/kW . Should this timeline and pricing hold true, the next tranche of consented OSW projects is likely to have a path to competitiveness come 2028. - More advanced technology : The current set of projects are generally anticipated to be using 14-15 MW turbines – a postponement of 4 years may allow developers to deploy the next generation of turbines with unit capacity of 18 MW or more. The US projects may also be able to benefit from future advancements in cables, electrical systems, foundation designs and installation technologies, giving them a potential benefit in terms of levelized cost of energy compared to todays estimates. - A more fully developed global supply chain : OSW projects around the world are currently suffering from significant pressure on the global supply chain, including critical HVDC infrastructure, vessels and other key components. Some of that stress was previously anticipated to be addressed through new manufacturing and assembly facilities in the US, backstopped by the domestic offshore wind industry and further supported by local content requirements and investment incentives as set out in the IRA and other policies. With the current project forecast and US policy changes, these OEMs are likely looking for more favorable investment environments, likely in Europe, the UK or Asia. Developers looking at US OSW developments in 2028 may be able to secure significantly better commercial terms from the supply chain based on reduced global supply chain pressure, however local content expectations may need to be revisited as OEM may be less willing to further extend there recently expanded manufacturing base. Objective Realism However, the set of 2028 US OSW projects will also face substantial hurdles. - Technological competition : While, as noted, OSW compares favorably on average to alternative technologies such as gas fired power, the current burdens on offshore wind business cases will undoubtedly support the advancement of alternative power sources including gas, micro and small modular reactors (SMRs) and possibly interconnectors for incremental electricity imports as utilities look to close the gap between demand and generation. As these alternatives technologies are deployed, their respective supply chains will be further developed, degrading the current cost and schedule advantage for offshore wind. - Investment entrenched in proven, stable markets : For all its recurrent challenges with short term OSW market volatility and uncertainty, looking over the long term, European jurisdictions have shown a steady commitment the offshore wind sector for decades. Investors, with their US projects on hold, or otherwise looking to invest in the industry, may divert their capital to more established European markets. Given the long-term nature of these projects, this likely refocus on Europe may well be ‘sticky’ leaving less capital available for reinvestment in US projects late in the decade should policy shift. - Further maturation of new jurisdictions : A four year pause in the US offshore wind sector may allow emerging markets some breathing space to develop, by opening up investment capacity and room in the supply chain for projects in Australia, South America, the Baltic, Canada and other regions early in their OSW development. This may enable some of these new markets to get a foothold in the global market, attracting investment from developers and OEMs. For the US, this may result in more competition for foreign capital if the market looks to restart late in the decade, and the US may need to reset its expectations in any future leasing rounds and procurement processes. - Increased perception of US regulatory risk : Underpinning all of this is the changing view of foreign and domestic investors into political and regulatory risk for US projects in the offshore wind industry and more broadly. Before committing development funds to multi-billion-dollar projects with decade long timelines, investors will need to quantify the risk that these prospective projects might be derailed by a future administration. That risk will be costed into the economic models, impacting pricing for future procurements, return expectations and project valuations. A Pragmatic Path Forward So where does this leave the US OSW industry? I’ll certainly be holding my breath alongside the rest of the industry looking for this first tranche of commercial projects to finish construction and start operations. Provided the permits for the next tranche of projects withstand the next few years, the proponents will likely face significantly different market conditions as they look to restart their projects in 2028. The uncertainty may lead some developers to look to divest rather than suspend their projects, leading to an increase in transaction activity as those market players with lower risk tolerance or less patience leave the market. While these are trying times, the US OSW may do well to look to lessons learned from prior, albeit less dramatic, downturns in the European industry’s history: Stem the bleeding : We’re already seeing evidence of the remaining projects putting their heads down, reducing spend and waiting for more favorable investment conditions. LinkedIn feeds are filled with key project staff who’ve been laid off to reduce project costs and discretionary development funding is being deferred until the market is improved. Retain key assets : While reducing development costs is essential, developers cannot lose sight of the need to retain key assets, including key project team members, relationships with regulators, utilities, ports and the supply chain. Long-term, the market rewards agility : Those projects that can continue to negotiate with suppliers, utilities and regulators to adapt their schedules, project scopes and contract terms will be better able to rapidly pivot as the market, regulation and trade policy evolve. Ultimately the winners, if we can call anyone that in this situation, will be the projects able to think creatively, collaborate with favorable states to retain sector progress where possible and adapt their strategies to meet the new reality. Previous Next

< Back Let Developers Lead: The Smarter Path Forward For Offshore Wind May 30th, 2025 Written by Siniša Lozo, Director of Business Development at Naver Energy I have worked across Europe, from mature to emerging offshore wind markets, wearing many hats: project developer, market builder, policy shaper. In some markets, we had to build the rules and the project simultaneously. And what I have learned is this: if you want offshore wind to succeed - you need to let those who develop lead – and listen to the local community. This isn’t a plea for deregulation or a swipe at government. It’s about being honest with what works. And what works is speed, flexibility, and real-world engagement—something the entire offshore wind sector desperately needs right now. Offshore Wind is a U.S. Renaissance Waiting to Happen Let’s be clear - offshore wind isn’t just a climate tool. It’s an industrial renaissance waiting to happen. It creates high-quality jobs, powers heavy industry, revives shipyards and ports, and strengthens energy independence. Done right, it’s a win for both sides of the political aisle: · For progressives: clean energy and green jobs. · For conservatives: private enterprise, national strength, and less reliance on foreign supply chains. That’s the beauty of offshore wind—it can speak both languages. But to realize this, we need a new way of thinking. Stop Over Planning. Start Listening - & Start Building East Coast projects have struggled under a plan-led model—rigid, top-down, slow. Permitting delays, rising costs, and canceled projects have shown how fragile over-engineered systems can be. Europe has seen these problems too. While the U.S. East Coast offers the first commercial-scale offshore wind farm, Vineyard Wind , it took more than a decade to get there. Permitting delays, legal battles, and regulatory complexity dragged the project out far longer than it should have. It was a plan-led project from the start, shaped heavily by federal processes rather than developer initiative. Vineyard Wind is a milestone - but also a warning. A cautionary success story. For every project like it, others have failed or stalled. Ørsted’s cancellation of Ocean Wind 1 and 2 in New Jersey sent shockwaves through the industry. Projects on paper don’t always become steel in the water. Far from it - Europe has faced the same. Meanwhile, on the West Coast, California’s CADEMO project tells a different story. Just 60 MW - but light-years ahead in terms of process. Developer-led, community-engaged, union-connected. They didn’t wait for a perfect policy - they got to work. The same goes for similar projects in Europe. I call them pathfinder projects . In my view, these pathfinder projects are quietly setting a smarter precedent. Developer-led from the beginning - because they move faster, engage earlier, and most importantly: they build local trust by working hand-in-hand with unions, regulators, and local communities. They prove that when developers are empowered - not micromanaged - - they can drive innovation and build momentum alongside key local stakeholders. When Developers Lead and Collaborate With The Local Community, Things Happen: · They move faster than bureaucracy. · They adapt quickly to real-world conditions. · They build trust early - before resistance forms. · They help shape smarter regulation through action, not abstraction. Early stakeholder engagement is key - and the mindset must be proactive , not reactive . And this isn’t just California dreaming. The global proof is already out there: · In Scotland , Neart na Gaoithe built stakeholder trust early and shaved months off its timeline. · In Australia , Ørsted is embedding its Gippsland wind farms into the local community strategy from day one. · In Denmark , the Thor project didn’t just tick boxes—it listened. RWE invited public feedback before anything was final. That engagement shifted infrastructure plans and brought communities on board. These aren’t buzzwords. They’re the difference between headlines and steel in the water. Conclusion If we want offshore wind to succeed in the U.S. - politically, economically, and socially - a developer-led process is needed. We need to build trust , momentum , and ownership . CADEMO should be seen as a blueprint , not an exception in the US. It may be small in size, but it’s massive in meaning. It proves that when developers lead - and when communities are part of the journey - offshore wind can not only survive in tough markets, it can thrive. Doing it right means listening before building , engaging before imposing , and acting before over planning . It means recognizing that developer-led models, guided by real-world experience and grounded in local relationships, can outperform rigid, plan-led ones - whether in California, Denmark, Scotland, or Australia. This moment is too important to be trapped in slow-moving frameworks or even “stopped” entirely in the US. Offshore wind can be the superpower of energy - but only if we unleash those ready to build and let them lead. Done right, and sold right, the U.S. has the potential to become the North Star of offshore wind globally. Previous Next

< Back Offshore Wind: The Reliability Anchor Hiding in Plain Sight May 16th, 2025 Written by Adrienne Downey, Director of Offshore Wind at Power Advisory LLC. As electricity demand surges and fossil generation retires, North America’s grid is entering a reliability crunch. According to NERC, half the U.S. grid could face capacity shortfalls within the decade. In PJM, summer peaks are forecast to reach 230 GW by 2045 , while New York’s winter peak could hit 52 GW by 2040 — more than double today’s level. Traditionally, gas has been the grid’s safety net. But that role is slipping. Turbine backlogs now push deployment into the 2030s, and new 25% steel and aluminum tariffs add cost and complexity. Even firm resources are proving far less firm than assumed. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are the next big hope for some. On paper, they offer scalable, flexible, zero-carbon nuclear capacity. But early analysis pegs SMR costs at $863/kW annually — about $109/MWh , assuming a generous 90% capacity factor. As Twain said, “History doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes.” The pattern of underestimating costs for complex, capital-heavy infrastructure should give anyone pause. SMRs remain unproven at scale, subject to long permitting timelines, and exposed to the same material tariffs now hobbling other technologies. And beyond economics, they reopen nuclear’s thorniest questions — from operational risk to multi-century waste management. The U.S. has no active plan for permanent high-level waste storage, and Yucca Mountain remains stalled. Expecting institutions to safely steward radioactive material over millennia, when most policy can barely see past the next budget cycle, is a gamble with profound implications. What we need is a resource that’s reliable, scalable, clean, and ready to build now. That’s offshore wind. Solar and onshore wind are foundational to our energy future, and the recent surge in storage is a welcome boon. But storage still needs power . Offshore wind brings unique value: strong, steady output during winter, when electrification-driven demand is rising. Along the Eastern Seaboard, ELCC studies show offshore wind delivering up to 69% of its nameplate capacity during peak conditions. In New York, a 25 GW offshore portfolio could contribute up to 10 GW of winter reliability — nearly 20% of peak. In PJM, New Jersey’s 11 GW target could deliver 7.6 GW of ELCC-qualified capacity. Pull offshore wind from the table, and reserve margins collapse. Up to 20 GW of dependable, clean capacity disappears. Scarcity pricing kicks in. Ratepayers take the hit — or worse yet, are left in the dark. And this all assumes everything else goes right — new gas, storage, seamless imports. But now even Canadian hydro imports face a 25% tariff — a cost hit households can ill afford — especially during winter, when rising grocery prices, heating bills, and inflation have already strained family budgets. Like all new generation in active development, offshore wind is tariff-exposed today — but once built, it delivers power without volatile fuel costs, trade dependencies, or emissions. And as we’ll explore in a future piece, the influence of zero-fuel resources on market pricing may prove just as powerful. Resilience isn’t ideological — it’s structural. And offshore wind is a pillar we can’t afford to remove. You don’t need to believe in climate change to believe in keeping the lights on. You just need to believe in the numbers. And they say offshore wind isn’t a luxury — it’s a lifeline. Previous Next

Meet The Team Serene Hamsho Founder & President Sarah Collmus Director of Training Collin Fields Marketing & Communications Manager José Juan González Course Coordinator Hitesh Sancheti Digital Program Manager Negin Hashemi Content Coordinator Wafaa Al Habach Digital Media Coordinator

AOWA’s scholarship program empowers the next generation of offshore wind professionals. Apply today and advance your career in clean energy Empower Your Career with AOWA AOWA's scholarship program is designed to empower the next generation of leaders in offshore wind energy. We are committed to providing financial assistance to individuals who demonstrate a passion for renewable energy and the potential to contribute to the industry's future growth. Our scholarships are awarded on a case-by-case basis and are intended to make our comprehensive training programs accessible to a diverse range of participants. We particularly encourage applications from underrepresented groups, including minorities, veterans, and individuals with disabilities, to ensure that the offshore wind sector benefits from the broadest possible range of talents and perspectives. Apply For a Scholarship Complete the form to be considered for our scholarship program. First Name Last Name Phone Email Address Company / Organization Name Current Title/Position Select an Address Course applying for (You may apply for multiple courses) Choose a course Ethnicity Choose an option Are you considered a minority? * Yes No Prefer not to say Are you a veteran? * Yes No Prefer not to say Gender Choose an option Do you have a disability? * Yes No Prefer not to say Region Additional Information (Optional) I understand that scholarships are not guaranteed and will be considered on a case-by-case and course-by-course basis. I certify that the information provided is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Submit Thanks for submitting! You will be notified of the decision via email.

Learn more about AOWA’s mission to train and empower professionals in the offshore wind industry through expert-led programs American Offshore Wind Academy The American Offshore Wind Academy (AOWA) is a pioneering initiative driven by offshore wind industry leaders who are committed to advancing and strengthening the sector. The Academy’s mission is to empower and advance the offshore wind industry in the United States and worldwide through comprehensive education, training, and collaboration. With a commitment to excellence, innovation, and industry growth, the Academy strives to empower individuals, organizations, governments, and the broader offshore wind community to make a significant and lasting impact on the clean energy landscape of the world. Board of Advisors Eric Thumma Head of U.S., Corio Generation Jim Bennett Former Chief of The Office of Renewable Energy Programs, BOEM Amy McGinty Vice President, Vestas North America Alla Weinstein Founder & CEO, Trident Winds Inc Mike Starrett Chief Commercial Officer, Ocean Winds North America Adrienne Downey Principal Engineer and Country Manager, Hexicon North American Mandar Pandit Chief Strategy & Growth Officer, GE Grid Solutions Jay Borkland Supply Chain and Port Director, Avangrid Serene Hamsho President, American Offshore Wind Academy Theodore Paradise Energy Partner, K&L Gates Lydia Lostan Offshore Wind Director, EDF Renewables North America STAY IN THE KNOW Enter your email here Sign Up Thanks for submitting!

American Offshore Wind Academy (AOWA) offers expert-led offshore wind training programs for professionals. Advance your career with industry-leading courses EXPERTS TEACHING EXPERTS View Courses 115+ SME Instructors 50+ Comprehensive Courses 21+ Training Partners 430+ Trained Professionals 30+ Countries Industry Trusted Partner American Offshore Wind Academy The American Offshore Wind Academy (AOWA) is a pioneering initiative driven by offshore wind industry leaders who are committed to advancing and strengthening the sector. The Academy’s mission is to empower and advance the offshore wind industry in the United States and worldwide through comprehensive education, training, and collaboration. With a commitment to excellence, innovation, and industry growth, the Academy strives to empower individuals, organizations, governments, and the broader offshore wind community to make a significant and lasting impact on the clean energy landscape of the world. STAY IN THE KNOW Enter your email here Sign Up Thanks for submitting!

< Back Offshore Wind: Fueling Economic Growth Across the U.S. February 12, 2025 Offshore wind power is more than just a clean energy source; it's a catalyst for economic revitalization, creating a ripple effect of jobs, investment, and opportunity that stretches across the United States. While the turbines themselves capture the imagination of many, the true story lies in the intricate supply chain that fuels this burgeoning industry, a network that spans the nation and breathes new life into communities from coast to coast. The narrative of offshore wind isn't confined to coastal regions. It's a story woven across the country, where American ingenuity and manufacturing prowess are driving a wave of economic growth. From steel mills in the Midwest to shipyards along the Gulf Coast, businesses are seizing the opportunities presented by this burgeoning sector, creating a tapestry of economic activity that benefits communities nationwide. Manufacturing Momentum: Building the Foundation for a Clean Energy Future The offshore wind industry relies on a complex web of suppliers, manufacturers, and skilled workers. This translates into a surge in demand for everything from raw materials like steel to specialized components like turbines and cables. Steel mills in states like Ohio, Kentucky, and Alabama are ramping up production to meet the demand for wind-grade steel, fueling a resurgence in American manufacturing. Factories are also expanding and retooling to produce nacelles, blades, and other critical components, creating high-paying jobs and revitalizing industrial centers. This manufacturing momentum isn't just about big corporations. Small and medium-sized businesses across the country are finding their niche in the offshore wind supply chain. From providing specialized engineering services to fabricating custom parts, these businesses are becoming integral players in the industry, contributing to local economies and creating new opportunities for entrepreneurs. Shipbuilding Surge: Launching a New Era of Maritime Prosperity The construction and maintenance of offshore wind farms require a specialized fleet of vessels, creating a surge in demand for shipbuilding and related maritime services. Shipyards in states like Texas, Louisiana, Florida, and Wisconsin are buzzing with activity, building and retrofitting vessels that will transport components, install turbines, and maintain offshore wind farms for decades to come. This shipbuilding boom is not only creating jobs in coastal communities but also supporting a vast network of suppliers across the country, from engine manufacturers to electronics providers. This resurgence in shipbuilding is breathing new life into once-dormant shipyards, creating opportunities for skilled tradespeople like welders, electricians, and machinists. It's also driving investment in port infrastructure, as coastal communities prepare to serve as hubs for offshore wind development. A National Network: Jobs and Opportunity Across 40 States The impact of the offshore wind supply chain extends far beyond manufacturing and shipbuilding. A recent report from Oceantic Network revealed that the industry's supply chain touches 40 states, with nearly 2,000 supplier contracts in place. This means that even landlocked states are benefiting from the offshore wind boom, with businesses providing everything from logistics and transportation services to financial and legal expertise. The ripple effect of this economic activity is significant. The offshore wind industry is not just creating jobs directly related to manufacturing and construction; it's also supporting a wide range of ancillary industries, from hospitality and retail to education and training. This creates a multiplier effect, where the benefits of offshore wind development spread throughout local communities and regional economies. Investing in the Future: Building a Skilled Workforce The growth of the offshore wind industry requires a skilled workforce, and investments in education and training are crucial to ensuring that American workers are ready to seize these opportunities. Community colleges and vocational schools are developing specialized training programs to prepare workers for careers in manufacturing, shipbuilding, and offshore operations. Apprenticeships and on-the-job training programs are providing workers with the hands-on experience they need to succeed in this dynamic industry. These workforce development initiatives are not only creating pathways to well-paying jobs but also ensuring that the U.S. has the talent pool it needs to compete in the global offshore wind market. Live-virtual trainings on technical aspects of offshore wind are also playing a pivotal role in preparing a dynamic workforce. These interactive sessions provide an accessible way to disseminate critical knowledge about the complex technologies and processes involved in offshore wind, from turbine installation and maintenance to grid integration and safety protocols. For industry professionals, these trainings offer opportunities to upskill, stay abreast of the latest innovations, and enhance their expertise, leading to improved project efficiency and performance. Simultaneously, they empower workforce development initiatives by equipping potential new entrants with foundational knowledge, bridging the skills gap, and creating pathways to well-paying jobs in this rapidly expanding sector. The American Offshore Wind Academy offers a variety of technical training taught by industry professionals. Check out some of our available courses: Transmission , MetOcean , Risk Management , Ports & Vessels , Financing , Geophysical & Geotechnical , OSW Upskilling . A Win-Win: Clean Energy and Economic Growth The offshore wind industry represents a win-win for America. It's a pathway to clean, reliable energy that reduces our dependence on fossil fuels and mitigates the impacts of climate change. It's also a powerful engine for economic growth, creating jobs, driving investment, and revitalizing communities across the nation. By boosting domestic manufacturing and employing skilled workers across the country, the offshore wind industry demonstrates that clean energy and economic prosperity can go hand in hand. Check out this interactive map from ACP: Proposed Investments in U.S. Offshore Wind Sources Oceanic Network , ACP , Real Clear Energy , Offshore Wind Biz , Riviera Previous Next

< Back Offshore Wind's Scaling Debate: Power, Progress, and Potential Pitfalls April 9, 2025 The offshore wind industry has witnessed a remarkable surge in technological advancement, characterized by a global "arms race" to develop the most powerful and efficient turbines. This drive for upscaling is fueled by the urgent need to meet ambitious renewable energy targets, but it also raises critical questions about the industry's long-term sustainability. A Race for Power The sheer scale of innovation is astounding. Companies like Mingyang Smart Energy are pushing the boundaries of what's possible, with their unveiling of the MySE 22 MW turbine. This giant, boasting a 22-MW rated capacity and a rotor diameter exceeding 310 meters, represents a significant leap forward in wind energy generation. Simultaneously, established players like Siemens Gamesa are actively testing their own high-capacity prototypes, such as the 21.5-MW turbine being trialed in Denmark. This intense competition is driving rapid technological evolution, with each new turbine promising greater efficiency and energy output. The Economic Drivers The appeal of these colossal turbines is undeniable. Their potential to significantly reduce costs is a major catalyst. By requiring fewer installations to achieve the same energy output, developers can save on foundation, cable, and installation expenses. Furthermore, reduced maintenance needs contribute to lower operational costs. This can potentially help developers win bids for their electricity as they are able to produce it at a lower cost. Mingyang has claimed that compared to using 13-MW turbines, its new 22-MW model would reduce the number of turbines needed for a 1-GW offshore wind farm by 18 units, significantly reducing capital expenditure. Figure from “Scaling the Offshore Wind Industry and Optimizing Turbine Size” by NREL The Overall Benefits to Upscaling Increased Energy Output: -Larger turbines can capture more wind energy due to their larger rotor swept areas. -Taller turbines access stronger and more consistent wind speeds, leading to higher capacity factors. Reduced Costs: -Fewer turbines are required to achieve the same energy output, reducing the number of foundations, cables, and other infrastructure components. -This leads to lower installation, maintenance, and operational costs. -Economies of scale in manufacturing can further drive down the cost of energy. Improved Efficiency : -Larger turbines can optimize energy capture and conversion, leading to higher overall efficiency. -Fewer turbines in a wind farm can reduce wake effects, allowing for more efficient use of the available wind resource. Optimized Resource Utilization: -Larger turbines allow for more energy to be generated from a set lease area. -Wider turbine spacing can reduce navigational concerns, and reduce the sea bed foot print. Driving Innovation : -The push for larger turbines stimulates innovation in materials, manufacturing, and design, leading to potential advancements in other industries. Navigating the Challenges This rapid pursuit of larger turbines presents a complex set of challenges. Concerns are growing about the technological maturity of these massive structures. The risk of premature deployment and potential future failures cannot be ignored. Moreover, the increased size of these turbines necessitates significant infrastructure upgrades, including larger ports and specialized vessels, potentially rendering existing facilities obsolete. Supply chain constraints are another critical consideration. The surge in demand for larger components could lead to delays and cost increases. Furthermore, the structural integrity of these increasingly massive turbines is a paramount concern, requiring robust designs and advanced materials. A significant point of discussion is the impact that this rapid technological advancement is having on the industrialization and optimization of the offshore wind industry. There are concerns that the speed of the turbine upscaling, is outpacing the ability for the industry to optimize installation, and maintenance procedures. In addition, the EU is now voicing concern over the competitive nature of the Chinese turbine production, and the effect that it could have on the European market. The Main Arguments Against Further Upscaling Technical & Engineering Challenges : -Structural Integrity: Ensuring the stability and durability of these massive structures in harsh offshore environments is a significant engineering hurdle. As turbines grow in size, they experience increased loads, potentially leading to structural fatigue and failures. -Floating Platform Design: Developing stable and efficient floating platforms for these larger turbines, especially in deeper waters, presents complex hydrodynamic challenges. -Technological Maturity: The rapid pace of development may outstrip the industry's ability to thoroughly test and validate these new technologies, increasing the risk of premature failures. Logistical & Supply Chain Concerns: -Infrastructure Demands: Larger turbines require significant port upgrades and specialized vessels for transportation and installation, potentially straining existing infrastructure. -Supply Chain Constraints: The increased demand for massive components like blades and towers can lead to supply chain bottlenecks, delays, and rising costs. -Transportation Challenges: Moving very large components from manufacturing sites to ports, and then out to sea, presents very large logistical problems. Economic & Industry Impact: -Increased Costs: While upscaling aims to reduce costs in the long term, the initial investment in research, development, and infrastructure upgrades can be substantial. -Obsolete technology: Previous generations of wind turbines, and the infrastructure that supports them, can become obsolete very quickly, creating large amounts of stranded assets. Social Considerations: -Visual Impact: Larger turbines can have a greater visual impact on coastal landscapes, potentially leading to public opposition. A Call for Balance The offshore wind industry finds itself at a crucial juncture. While the potential benefits of upscaling are undeniable, a balanced approach is essential. The industry must prioritize technological reliability, supply chain resilience, and infrastructure development. Careful consideration of the long-term implications of these advancements is vital to ensure the sustainable growth of offshore wind energy. While some countries like China have the infrastructure capabilities to develop exceedingly larger turbines, other regions like the U.S. are limited by a variety of factors such as port availability and government policy. For example, the Jones Act requires the use of domestic vessels for offshore projects, necessitating billions of dollars in investment in port and vessel upgrades to accommodate larger turbines. A variety of turbine scales will likely be needed to supply the global market with options that are most suitable for their infrastructure and supply chain. The current drive towards larger offshore wind turbines underscores the industry's commitment to maximizing renewable energy generation and reducing costs. The economic incentives for upscaling, particularly the potential for lower levelized cost of energy and more efficient utilization of offshore resources, are significant drivers. However, this rapid technological progression necessitates careful consideration of associated challenges, including ensuring the robustness and reliability of these advanced machines, adapting existing infrastructure and supply chains, and managing potential market disruptions. Recognizing that different regions possess varying infrastructure capabilities and policy frameworks, a diversified approach that strategically deploys a range of turbine scales may prove to be the most pragmatic and effective pathway to realizing the full global potential of offshore wind power. For a more in-depth conversation, check out this webinar about offshore wind turbine scaling by NYSERDA with Walt Musial from National Renewable Energy Laboratory Previous Next

< Back Shell Pulls Back From Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Project January 31, 2025 In a significant blow to New Jersey's ambitious offshore wind energy plans, Shell has announced it is pausing its involvement in the Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind . During its fourth-quarter earnings call, the energy giant revealed it was writing down its investment in the project by a substantial $996 million, signaling serious concerns about its financial viability. "We just don’t see that it fits both our capabilities nor the returns that we would like," Shell Chief Financial Officer Sinead Gorman explained, effectively halting Shell's participation. This decision throws the future of Atlantic Shores, a joint venture between Shell and EDF Renewables North America , into considerable doubt. The 2.8 GW project, located around 9 miles off the New Jersey coast, was once considered a flagship venture, touted as the closest offshore wind project to shore along the Eastern Seaboard. However, its proximity to the coast also made it a lightning rod for criticism, drawing fire from New Jersey Republicans and even former President Donald Trump, who publicly targeted the project. While EDF Renewables has yet to issue a formal statement, Atlantic Shores released a statement asserting its intention to move forward. “Atlantic Shores is committed to New Jersey and delivering the Garden State’s first offshore wind project. Business plans, projects, portfolio projections, and scopes evolve over time – and as expected for large, capital-intensive infrastructure projects like ours, our shareholders have always prepared long-term strategies that contemplate multiple scenarios that enable Atlantic Shores to reach its full potential. While we can’t comment on the views of shareholders, Atlantic Shores intends to continue progressing New Jersey’s first offshore wind project and our portfolio in compliance with our obligations to local, state, and federal partners under existing leases and relevant permits.” Shell's decision to step back from Atlantic Shores reflects a broader trend of the company scaling back its investments in renewable energy. Despite previously positioning offshore wind as a central pillar of its net-zero emissions strategy announced in 2020, Shell has steadily retreated from the sector. Rising project costs and investor pressure for higher returns in the traditional oil and gas business have led the company to prioritize "performance, discipline, and simplification," according to a company spokesperson. This includes a focus on "value maximization in key markets where we have an advantaged position." Shell had already sold its stake in a Massachusetts offshore wind project last year, further demonstrating its shifting priorities. The withdrawal is a significant setback for New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy's ambitious offshore wind energy goals. The state has already faced setbacks in its renewable energy plans, notably the cancellation of the Ørsted project last year. The loss of Shell's backing for Atlantic Shores raises serious questions about the feasibility of the project moving forward and casts a shadow over New Jersey's broader efforts to transition to clean energy sources. The future of Atlantic Shores, and indeed New Jersey's offshore wind industry, now hangs in the balance. Credit: E&E News Update (2/3/25): New Jersey has cancelled its fourth solicitation for offshore wind capacity. The state's Board of Public Utilities said that while there were three initial bidders for the 1.2 GW to 4 GW solicitation, Corio-Total-Rise joint venture Attentive Energy and RWE-National Grid venture Community Offshore Wind have since pulled out, leaving only Atlantic Shores to submit a best and final offer. Shell's decision to pull out of the Atlantic Shores joint venture with EDF contributed to the Board's decision to cancel the solicitation, as well as President Donald Trump's indefinite delay on new federal permitting. According to Christine Guhl-Sadovy, from New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, "A number of reasons led to this decision, notably Shell backing out as an equity partner in the Atlantic Shores project and backing away from the American clean energy market, as well as uncertainty driven by federal actions and permitting. "The Board concluded that an award in New Jersey's fourth offshore wind solicitation, despite the manifold benefits the industry offers to the state, would not be a responsible decision at this time." Credit: ReNews.biz Previous Next

< Back Closing the Loop: DOE Report Charts Path to Sustainable Wind Turbine Recycling February 4, 2025 A new report from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) offers a roadmap for a more sustainable wind energy industry through increased recycling and reuse of decommissioned wind turbine components. The report, " Recycling Wind Energy Systems in the United States ," reveals that while existing infrastructure can handle 90% of the mass of decommissioned turbines, innovative solutions are needed for the remaining 10%, primarily blades, generators, and nacelle covers. This research will inform over $20 million in Bipartisan Infrastructure Law investments aimed at bridging this gap. "The U.S. already has the ability to recycle most wind turbine materials, so achieving a fully sustainable domestic wind energy industry is well within reach," stated Jeff Marootian, principal deputy assistant secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. "Innovation is key to closing the loop, and this research will help guide national investments and strategies aimed at advancing technologies that can solve the remaining challenges." The report, compiled by a team of researchers from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory , Oak Ridge National Laboratory , and Sandia National Laboratories , outlines short, medium, and long-term research and development priorities. It emphasizes the need for improved decommissioning practices, strategic siting of recycling facilities, expanded infrastructure, and the development of more easily recyclable materials and component designs. Recovering critical materials like nickel, cobalt, and zinc from generators and power electronics is also highlighted as crucial for a circular economy. Current recycling efforts focus on easily recyclable components like towers, foundations, and steel subcomponents. However, the report identifies blades (made of composite materials), generators, and nacelle covers as more challenging. Short-term strategies include promoting thermoplastic resins in blade production and reusing these resins in cement. Medium and long-term solutions include pyrolysis and chemical dissolution for blades, high-yield separation techniques for power electronics, and hybrid methods for recycling permanent magnets. Regional factors, such as material demand and transportation costs, will play a significant role in the economic viability of recycling. The DOE is actively supporting this transition through several initiatives: $20 Million Investment : The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is funding a Wind Energy Recycling Research, Development, and Demonstration program focused on sustainable components, material recycling, and qualifying recycled materials. $3.6 Million Prize Competition : The Wind Turbine Materials Recycling Prize has awarded six winners to advance their recycling technologies toward commercialization. The DOE's research draws from its Renewable Energy Materials Properties Database (REMPD) and incorporates life cycle and techno-economic assessments of various recycling pathways. The goal is to develop efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible methods for managing decommissioned wind turbine materials. This includes evaluating current industry practices, assessing the research landscape, and identifying opportunities for emerging technologies. By promoting a circular economy in the wind energy sector, the DOE aims to reduce material supply chain vulnerabilities, conserve resources, and enhance the sustainability of wind power, contributing to a cleaner energy future. Companies like RWE and Siemens Gamesa are also taking steps towards circularity. RWE's Sofia offshore wind farm in the UK will deploy 132 recyclable turbine blades (44 of its 100 turbines), supplied by Siemens Gamesa. This follows a successful pilot of the technology at RWE's Kaskasi wind farm in Germany. These recyclable blades utilize a new resin that allows for material separation and reuse in various applications, marking a significant advancement in wind turbine sustainability. While other blade recycling methods are in development, these "designed-for-recycling" blades represent a major step forward. Sofia, a 1.4 GW project, is slated for completion in 2026 and underscores RWE's commitment to innovation and sustainability in offshore wind. Credit: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Previous Next

< Back Beyond the Horizon: The Future of Offshore Wind is Floating February 26, 2025 The global energy landscape is undergoing a dramatic transformation, driven by the urgent need to decarbonize our economies and mitigate the impacts of climate change. Offshore wind energy has emerged as a critical component of this transition, offering a clean, abundant, and increasingly cost-competitive alternative to fossil fuels. However, the full potential of offshore wind has been constrained by the limitations of traditional fixed-bottom installations, restricting development to shallower coastal waters. Floating offshore wind turbines represent the future of offshore power, unlocking access to vast, untapped wind resources in deeper waters and ushering in a new era of clean energy generation. The Untapped Potential of the Deep Offshore wind offers significant advantages over its onshore counterpart, including higher capacity factors due to stronger and more consistent winds. Traditional fixed-bottom offshore wind turbines, however, are economically and technically limited by water depth and complex seabed conditions. These limitations significantly restrict the geographic scope of development. Floating platforms, anchored to the seabed by flexible mooring systems, overcome these constraints, enabling turbines to be deployed in deeper waters where wind resources are significantly more abundant and consistent. Crucially, around 80% of the world's exploitable offshore wind resources reside in waters deeper than 60 meters (~200 ft.), a domain currently inaccessible to fixed-bottom installations. Floating offshore wind thus represent a critical pathway to harnessing this vast, untapped energy potential. While the global floating wind industry remains in its early stages, with approximately 270 MW of operational capacity as of 2023, the future appears exceptionally promising. The global project pipeline has surged to 244 GW, demonstrating substantial industry momentum. The United States, recognizing its vast deep-water resources, currently has over 6 GW of floating projects in its development pipeline, with a significant portion under site control. Given that over two-thirds of the nation's offshore wind potential lies in deep waters, a 2022 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) estimates the U.S. technical potential for floating offshore wind at a staggering 2,773 GW, capable of generating nearly 9,000 terawatt-hours of energy annually. Technological Innovation at the Forefront Floating offshore wind farms consist of wind turbines mounted on floating platforms, which are stabilized by sophisticated mooring and anchoring systems. Just like fixed-bottom offshore wind farms, the kinetic energy of the wind is captured by the turbine blades, converted into electricity, and transmitted via subsea cables to onshore substations for distribution. Several innovative platform designs are under development, each tailored to specific environmental conditions and project requirements: Barge Platforms: Characterized by their large surface area in contact with the water, barge platforms offer inherent stability, similar to a ship. Their relatively simple design makes them a potentially cost-effective solution for certain applications. Semi-submersible Platforms: These platforms minimize their exposure to wave action by reducing the water plane area while maximizing submerged volume for buoyancy. This design offers enhanced stability in challenging sea states. Spar Platforms: Spar platforms achieve stability through a deep-draft design, with the majority of the weight concentrated at the lowest point. This approach provides excellent stability but can present challenges in manufacturing and deployment. Tension Leg Platforms (TLPs): TLPs are anchored to the seabed using tensioned tendons, effectively minimizing platform motion. This design offers the potential for cost reduction by minimizing the size of the floating structure. The selection of the optimal platform type is a complex decision, influenced by a multitude of factors including site-specific conditions, water depth, wind resource characteristics, turbine size, cost considerations, and supply chain availability. Image credit: Iberdrola Mooring Systems Mooring systems are essential for maintaining the stability and position of floating wind turbine foundations, especially in deep water. These systems, comprising mooring lines and anchors, transfer forces from the foundation to the seabed, counteracting unwanted motions that could damage subsea power cables. They are typically composed of various steel chain sections alternating with some sections composed of synthetic fiber rope, usually polyester or nylon. Mooring configurations are tailored to site conditions, foundation type, and cable design, influencing the turbine's six degrees of motion. Taut mooring lines, often used with tension leg platforms, connect the platform to high-load vertical anchors. Catenary lines, common in spar, barge, and semi-submersible platforms, utilize freely hanging chains and drag anchors. Anchors Anchors are critical for securing floating wind platforms to the seabed, and their design is heavily influenced by seabed characteristics. While various types exist, including deadweight, driven pile, drag, suction pile, gravity drop, and vertical load anchors, drag anchors are the most common due to their strong horizontal load resistance and good seabed penetration. However, they are less suited for vertical loads. Driven piles and suction piles offer alternative solutions, with suction piles also offering recoverability. A key innovation being explored is shared anchor systems, which allow multiple platforms to connect to a single anchor. This approach, demonstrated by Equinor 's Hywind Tampen project, can reduce the total number of anchors required, improving efficiency and potentially lowering costs compared to projects like Hywind Scotland. More information on anchors and moorings: Fact sheet from offshore wind Scotland Image credit: IRENA Transmission Cables A key element for floating offshore wind cabling is the fact the cables are dynamic, meaning that they are designed to follow and withstand the motion of the floating sub-structure caused by wind, waves and current. They are developed specifically to be exposed to saltwater, to have high fatigue loads and to have tolerance to the motions of foundations and oceans. Dynamic cables usually have a non-lead insulator sheath and an additional armoring layer when compared to static cables. The Multifaceted Advantages of Floating Wind The adoption of floating offshore wind technology offers a compelling array of benefits: Access to Superior Wind Resources: Floating turbines unlock access to stronger, more consistent winds further offshore, resulting in significantly higher capacity factors compared to fixed-bottom installations. Capacity factors exceeding 60% are achievable, representing a substantial improvement over traditional fixed-bottom projects. Reduced Environmental Footprint: By locating further from shore, floating offshore wind farms minimize impacts on sensitive coastal ecosystems and marine life. Less noisy installation methods, such as the use of drag anchors and suction piles, further reduce disturbance to marine animals. Streamlined Manufacturing and Deployment: Floating platforms can be constructed and assembled onshore, simplifying logistics and reducing reliance on expensive heavy-lift vessels. Towing the completed platforms to the offshore site minimizes weather-dependent operations and facilitates easier maintenance, with some operations potentially conducted in port. Enhanced Public Opinion: The greater distance from shore reduces the visual impact and noise associated with wind farms, minimizing potential community resistance which can help facilitate smoother project development. Driving Cost Competitiveness: The floating offshore wind industry is experiencing rapid cost reductions, driven by technological advancements, economies of scale, and optimized manufacturing and installation processes. Stimulating Local Economies: Onshore assembly and manufacturing foster the development of local supply chains, creating valuable jobs and stimulating economic growth in coastal communities. The development of dedicated port infrastructure further enhances these economic benefits. Enhanced Scalability and Standardization: The potential for standardized platform designs offers significant cost advantages and accelerates deployment, enabling the rapid scaling of floating wind capacity. Navigating the Challenges While floating offshore wind holds immense promise, its widespread adoption faces a complex web of challenges that must be addressed to unlock its full potential. These challenges span technical, cost, environmental, regulatory, and infrastructural domains. Technical Challenges Deep Water Installation: Deploying massive wind turbines in the challenging environment of deep ocean waters presents significant logistical hurdles. Specialized vessels capable of handling and installing these large structures in deep water are required, driving up costs and demanding innovative installation techniques. Mooring Systems: The heart of a floating wind farm lies in its mooring system. Designing robust and reliable mooring systems that can withstand extreme weather conditions, including high winds, strong currents, and large waves, is crucial for maintaining platform stability and ensuring long-term operational integrity. Weather Dependence: Installation and maintenance operations for floating wind farms are inherently dependent on favorable weather windows. Rough seas and high winds can significantly disrupt these activities, leading to delays and increased costs. Developing strategies to mitigate weather-related risks is essential. Cable Management: Managing the intricate network of underwater cables that connect the floating turbines to the onshore grid poses a significant technical challenge. Protecting these cables from damage caused by marine life, strong currents, and other environmental factors is vital for reliable energy transmission. Transmitting electricity over longer distances can also result in greater efficiency losses, which can reduce the overall output to the grid. Cost Challenges High Capital Investment: The specialized technology required for floating wind farms, including the sophisticated floating foundations, advanced mooring systems, and subsea cables, necessitates substantial upfront capital investment. Reducing these initial costs is crucial for making floating wind competitive with other energy sources. Operation and Maintenance: The remote location of floating wind farms, often far offshore, makes operation and maintenance activities complex and expensive. Developing cost-effective strategies for accessing turbines for repairs and maintenance, particularly in harsh weather conditions, is essential for long-term economic viability. Environmental Challenges Marine Life Impacts: The construction and operation of floating wind farms have the potential to impact marine ecosystems. Noise from construction activities, electromagnetic fields from subsea cables, and the presence of turbine structures can potentially disrupt fish migration patterns, marine mammal behavior, and other aspects of the marine environment. Careful environmental assessments and mitigation measures are essential to building these projects in a responsible manner.. Regulatory Challenges Permitting Complexities: Navigating the complex and often lengthy permitting processes associated with offshore wind development can be a significant hurdle. Streamlining these processes while ensuring environmental protection is crucial for accelerating project timelines. Grid Connection: Integrating the electricity generated by floating wind farms into the existing power grid requires careful planning and coordination. Upgrading grid infrastructure and ensuring grid stability are essential for accommodating large-scale floating wind deployment. Infrastructure Challenges Port Limitations: The construction and assembly of large floating wind turbines require specialized port facilities with sufficient capacity, heavy-lift capabilities, and deep-water access. Many existing ports lack these capabilities, requiring significant investment in port infrastructure development. Vessel Availability: The installation and maintenance of floating wind farms require specialized vessels capable of operating in deep water and harsh weather conditions. The limited availability of these vessels can create bottlenecks and increase costs. Addressing these multifaceted challenges requires a concerted effort from industry, government, and research institutions. Continued innovation in technology, streamlined regulatory processes, strategic infrastructure investments, and a commitment to environmental stewardship are crucial for realizing the full potential of floating offshore wind and powering a sustainable future. Operational Developments Several floating offshore wind projects have demonstrated the viability and potential of this technology. Hywind Scotland, the world's first floating wind farm (30MW), has consistently achieved the highest average capacity factor of all UK offshore wind farms for three years running (reaching 57.1% in 2020), proving the potential of floating wind. Equinor, the developer, has achieved significant cost reductions (60-70%) between its demonstrator project and Hywind Scotland and anticipates further reductions (40%) with its larger 88 MW Hywind Tampen project. Hywind Tampen, the world's largest floating wind farm, powers offshore oil and gas platforms and serves as a testbed for future floating wind technologies. These projects showcase the technical feasibility, increasing cost-competitiveness, and real-world performance of floating offshore wind, paving the way for larger-scale deployments. Check out this video by Equinor about Hywind Scotland, the worlds first floating offshore wind project. Other Pilot Projects -The 25-MW WindFloat Atlantic project: The first floating wind farm in continental Europe, features three 8.4 MW turbines utilizing semi-submersible platforms. It has been operational since 2019, supplying clean energy to the 25,000 Portuguese households every year -The 25-MW Provence Grand Large pilot project: Three 8.4-MW Siemens Gamesa turbines on tension-leg floating platforms near Marseille, France. It is expected to produce the equivalent of the annual electricity consumption of 45,000 inhabitants. -The 3.6-MW Guoneng Sharing pilot project: A single turbine on a semisubmersible platform near Longyuan Nanri Island in China. -The 2-MW DemoSATH demonstration project in Spain: A single 2-MW turbine, designed to test the "SATH" (Saitec Offshore Technologies Hull) floating platform technology in real-world conditions off the Basque coast. While most other projects are still in the planning phase, it is estimated that around 14 GW of floating offshore wind capacity will be installed globally by 2029. Still, there is a high degree of uncertainty about their timing and likelihood of completion. Most of the developer announced deployment through 2029 is in the United Kingdom (4,242 MW), Italy (4,160 MW), Taiwan (1,530 MW), China (1,052 MW), and Spain (995 MW). The First Two-Turbine Floating Platform Mingyang Smart Energy has launched OceanX, a groundbreaking floating offshore wind platform featuring two 8.3MW turbines for a combined capacity of 16.6MW, making it the world's largest single-capacity floating wind turbine platform. Designed to withstand Category 5 hurricane conditions and continue generating power in winds up to 161 mph and waves as high as 98 feet, OceanX is expected to produce enough electricity to power approximately 30,000 Chinese households annually. A 1:10 scale prototype was successfully tested in 2020, and the full-scale platform has now been deployed to the Qingzhou IV offshore wind farm in Yangjiang, Guangdong, China. This innovative dual-turbine design, built with ultra-high-performance concrete and featuring 219-meter towers, represents a significant advancement in floating offshore wind technology. Image credit: Renew Economy Charting the Course for a Sustainable Future Floating offshore wind is not merely a promising technology; it is a transformative force poised to reshape the global energy landscape. By unlocking access to previously inaccessible wind resources, floating offshore wind farms have the potential to become a cornerstone of the clean energy transition. While challenges remain, the industry is rapidly maturing, propelled by innovation, investment, and a growing recognition of the immense potential of this technology. With continued focus on supply chain development, port infrastructure, and O&M strategies, floating offshore wind is poised to play a leading role in powering a sustainable future. Innovation in floating offshore wind technology is the key to unlocking the vast, untapped energy potential of deeper waters, paving the way for a cleaner and more secure future. Sources Equinor , NREL , OSW Biz , Iberdrola , Semar , Science Direct , Acteon , IRENA Previous Next